Assembly Line

Chatwoot vs LibreDesk

Chatwoot and LibreDesk are both live chat software. Chatwoot is open source under a license set out in its repository, with 39k GitHub stars. LibreDesk is open source under AGPL-3.0, with 3.1k GitHub stars.

Which to pick

Pick Chatwoot when
You want to self-host a shared inbox, especially one that handles WhatsApp or chat beside email.
Pick LibreDesk when
A small team wants a lightweight self-hosted Intercom or Zendesk replacement that is easy to deploy.

Side by side

What it does

A customer messaging inbox for email, website chat, WhatsApp, Telegram, SMS and social, with assignment, private notes, collision warnings, canned responses, rules, reports, contact profiles and mobile apps.

A customer support desk for email, live chat and WhatsApp, with shared inbox, automations and SLAs, distributed as a single Go binary.

Watch out

Reply-time policies are in the paid Enterprise edition, and the chat-style screen handles long email threads less naturally than an email client.

About 18 months old with one main maintainer.

Ready for

Production-ready

Usable

Runs as

Self-hosted server, cloud service and mobile app

Self-hosted server

Built with

Ruby, Rails, Vue, PostgreSQL and Redis

Go, Vue, PostgreSQL and Redis

Source code

Open source, license unclear on GitHub

Open source, AGPL-3.0 (network copyleft)

What the license allows

GitHub could not read the license. Check it in the repository before reusing any code.

Use inside your business is unrestricted. If you change it and let customers use it over the internet, you must publish your changes.

How widely known

39k GitHub stars

3.1k GitHub stars

How established

Established: started 7 years ago, latest release v4.19.1.

Established: started 2 years ago, latest release v2.9.2.

Other comparisons

More live chat and customer messaging tools

Every live chat product and project, ranked

Both sides were judged on 2026-11-06 from each project's README and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.