Halo vs Webflow
Halo and Webflow are both CMS software. Halo is open source under GPL-3.0, with 40k GitHub stars. Webflow is a commercial product from Webflow.
Which to pick
- Pick Halo when
- You want a WordPress-style site builder with a strong Chinese community and plugin market.
- Pick Webflow when
- A marketing team or designer wants pixel-level control of a site without developers, and the site fits Webflow's CMS limits.
Side by side
A Java website builder and CMS for blogs, knowledge bases, company sites and small shops, with themes and plugins.
A visual website builder that produces clean HTML and CSS, with a CMS, hosting and interactions.
Documentation and plugins are mostly Chinese, and some plugins and themes are paid.
Site plans plus workspace seats add up, CMS item limits apply, and moving off it means rebuilding.
Production-ready (both)
Self-hosted server
Cloud service
Java, Spring Boot, TypeScript and Vue
Not published
Open source, GPL-3.0 (strong copyleft)
Closed source, sold by Webflow
Use inside your business is unrestricted, but anything you distribute that includes it must be released under the same license.
Closed source: you use it under the maker's terms and cannot change or resell the code.
40k GitHub stars
460 Wikipedia readers a month on phones
Established: started 8 years ago, latest release v2.27.2.
Not known
Other comparisons
More content management systems
Both sides were judged on 2026-11-03 from makers' descriptions, Wikipedia, READMEs and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.