Contentful vs Halo
Contentful and Halo are both CMS software. Contentful is a commercial product from Contentful. Halo is open source under GPL-3.0, with 40k GitHub stars.
Which to pick
- Pick Contentful when
- A company with developers needs one content source feeding several websites and apps.
- Pick Halo when
- You want a WordPress-style site builder with a strong Chinese community and plugin market.
Side by side
A headless CMS where content is modelled as structured types and delivered by API to websites, apps and other channels.
A Java website builder and CMS for blogs, knowledge bases, company sites and small shops, with themes and plugins.
Pricing jumps steeply from the free tier to paid plans, and editors find it less friendly than page builders.
Documentation and plugins are mostly Chinese, and some plugins and themes are paid.
Production-ready (both)
Cloud service
Self-hosted server
Not published
Java, Spring Boot, TypeScript and Vue
Closed source, sold by Contentful
Open source, GPL-3.0 (strong copyleft)
Closed source: you use it under the maker's terms and cannot change or resell the code.
Use inside your business is unrestricted, but anything you distribute that includes it must be released under the same license.
181 Wikipedia readers a month on phones
40k GitHub stars
Not known
Established: started 8 years ago, latest release v2.27.2.
Other comparisons
More content management systems
Both sides were judged on 2026-11-03 from makers' descriptions, Wikipedia, READMEs and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.