Pingdom vs Uptime Kuma
Pingdom and Uptime Kuma are both uptime monitoring software. Pingdom is a commercial product from SolarWinds. Uptime Kuma is open source under MIT, with 93k GitHub stars.
Which to pick
- Pick Pingdom when
- A business wants established external monitoring of website uptime and performance.
- Pick Uptime Kuma when
- You want an easy, UptimeRobot-style monitor on your own server for a homelab or small business.
Side by side
Website uptime, page speed, transaction and real user monitoring with alerts, from SolarWinds.
A self-hosted monitoring tool that checks HTTP, TCP, ping, DNS, Docker and more, sends alerts through 90+ notification services and publishes status pages.
It is pricier and less developer-friendly than newer uptime tools.
Single-instance design, so it does not monitor from multiple locations or scale to very large numbers of checks.
Production-ready (both)
Cloud service
Self-hosted server
Not published
JavaScript, Vue, Node.js, SQLite and Socket.IO
Closed source, sold by SolarWinds
Open source, MIT (permissive)
Closed source: you use it under the maker's terms and cannot change or resell the code.
You can build it into a product you sell, as long as you keep its copyright notice.
25 Wikipedia readers a month on phones
93k GitHub stars
Not known
Established: started 5 years ago, latest release 2.5.9.
Other comparisons
More uptime monitors
Both sides were judged on 2026-11-03 from makers' descriptions, Wikipedia, READMEs and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.