Assembly Line

Jitsi Meet vs Microsoft Teams

Jitsi Meet and Microsoft Teams are both video conferencing software. Jitsi Meet is open source under Apache-2.0, with 30k GitHub stars. Microsoft Teams is a commercial product from Microsoft.

Which to pick

Pick Jitsi Meet when
You want a mature open-source Zoom alternative you can host yourself or embed in your own product.
Pick Microsoft Teams when
Your business already pays for Microsoft 365 and wants chat and video meetings without another vendor.

Side by side

What it does

A browser-based video conferencing platform with mobile apps and embeddable SDKs, offering screen sharing, chat, polls, breakout rooms and recording; usable free at meet.jit.si or self-hosted.

Chat, meetings, calls and file collaboration built on Microsoft 365, with SharePoint behind team files and optional phone system.

Watch out

Self-hosting large meetings needs the full Jitsi stack (Prosody, Jicofo, videobridges) and proper bandwidth; meet.jit.si now requires a login.

The client is heavy and the chat experience is clumsier than Slack; in the EU it is now sold separately from some Microsoft 365 plans.

Ready for

Production-ready (both)

Runs as

Self-hosted server, cloud service, mobile app and desktop app

Cloud service, desktop app and mobile app

Built with

TypeScript, React, React Native, Lua and Prosody

Not published

Source code

Open source, Apache-2.0 (permissive)

Closed source, sold by Microsoft

What the license allows

You can build it into a product you sell, as long as you keep its copyright notice.

Closed source: you use it under the maker's terms and cannot change or resell the code.

How widely known

30k GitHub stars

20k Wikipedia readers a month on phones

How established

Established: started 13 years ago, latest release stable/jitsi-meet_11248.

Not known

Other comparisons

More video conferencing software

Every video conferencing product and project, ranked

Both sides were judged on 2026-11-03 from makers' descriptions, Wikipedia, READMEs and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.