DocuSign CLM vs Wraft
DocuSign CLM and Wraft are both contract management software. DocuSign CLM is a commercial product from Docusign, Inc. Wraft is open source under AGPL-3.0, with 167 GitHub stars.
Which to pick
- Pick DocuSign CLM when
- A larger company already standardised on DocuSign wants contract workflows in the same ecosystem.
- Pick Wraft when
- A company producing many contracts or proposals wants templated authoring and approvals on its own server.
Side by side
DocuSign's contract lifecycle management for generating, negotiating, approving and storing agreements, integrated with DocuSign eSignature and Salesforce.
A document lifecycle platform for authoring business documents from templates, routing them for approval, generating PDFs with LaTeX or Typst and collecting signatures.
Configuration is complex and needs administrators or partners.
Still at version 0.6 with a small team; Elixir hosting skills help.
Production-ready
Experimental
Cloud service
Self-hosted server and cloud service
Not published
Elixir, Rust, PostgreSQL, Typst and LaTeX
Closed source, sold by Docusign, Inc.
Open source, AGPL-3.0 (network copyleft)
Closed source: you use it under the maker's terms and cannot change or resell the code.
Use inside your business is unrestricted. If you change it and let customers use it over the internet, you must publish your changes.
No Wikipedia article of its own
167 GitHub stars
Not known
Established: started 2 years ago, latest release v0.6.7.
Other comparisons
More contract management and legal document tools
Both sides were judged on 2026-11-03 from makers' descriptions, Wikipedia, READMEs and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.