Assembly Line

Carbon vs Epicor Kinetic

Carbon and Epicor Kinetic are both manufacturing (mrp/mes) software. Carbon is open source under AGPL-3.0, with 2.8k GitHub stars. Epicor Kinetic is a commercial product from Epicor Software Corporation.

Which to pick

Pick Carbon when
You make complex assemblies or high-mix, low-volume parts and want ERP, MES and quality in one system you can self-host or buy as Carbon Cloud.
Pick Epicor Kinetic when
A midsize make-to-order or mixed-mode manufacturer needs shop-floor and job costing depth beyond a general ERP.

Side by side

What it does

A manufacturing system that keeps quoting, orders, purchasing, inventory, MRP planning with finite-capacity scheduling, shop-floor travelers and labour capture, quality records and lot and serial traceability in one Postgres database.

ERP for discrete manufacturers covering production planning, scheduling, job costing, inventory, quality and finance.

Watch out

It is open core: the enterprise files, API keys and the MCP server need a paid plan or, when self-hosted, a commercial licence.

Implementations are configuration-heavy and upgrades between major versions take real effort.

Ready for

Usable

Production-ready

Runs as

Self-hosted server and cloud service

Cloud service and self-hosted server

Built with

TypeScript, React, PostgreSQL and Rust

.NET and Microsoft SQL Server

Source code

Open source, AGPL-3.0 (network copyleft)

Closed source, sold by Epicor Software Corporation

What the license allows

Use inside your business is unrestricted. If you change it and let customers use it over the internet, you must publish your changes.

Closed source: you use it under the maker's terms and cannot change or resell the code.

How widely known

2.8k GitHub stars

No Wikipedia article of its own

How established

Established: started 2 years ago, no tagged release yet.

Not known

Other comparisons

More manufacturing (MRP and MES) systems

Every manufacturing (mrp/mes) product and project, ranked

Both sides were judged on 2026-11-06 from makers' descriptions, Wikipedia, READMEs and GitHub data. License, age and popularity lines are worked out directly.